As a patriarchal society, the United States, along with much of the rest of the world, has established the male in a dominant role, with men socially conditioned to be providers, in control, and always to remain strong and manly. As a result of these socially constructed definitions of manhood, men have historically had to suppress their more tender feelings, leading sometimes to emotional isolation, alienation from their true feelings, and a feeling of powerlessness. Today men are finding the attributes of hegemonic, patriarchal masculinity untenable. Accordingly, men have begun to realize that they can take responsibility for their situations and change their lives if they so desire. Part of that change involves re-visioning, re-creating, and reconstructing healthier and less conflicted forms of masculine identity by making intentional choices to move out of the power and control cycle. As effective social remedies have been sought to help "men in crisis" (aside from therapeutic solutions), a highly, and increasingly successful intervention has proved to be participation in both self-help and mutual support groups. Mythopoetic men's peer mutual support groups are one setting where these reconstructions of masculine identity are occurring. This study focuses on the value of the mythopoetic branch of the contemporary men's movement as a rejection of patriarchal values, patriarchal masculinity, rather than just being another form of "repackaged" patriarchy.I'm curious about this work. Does anyone have access to this database who can send me this?
Edward Read Barton
Michigan State University
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Are Mythopoetic Men's Support Groups Repackaged Patriarchy?
Abstract:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 transmissions:
You might want to check out my book "Numen, Old Men: Contemporary Masculine Spiritualities and the Problem of Patriarchy" which argues that the mythopoetic movement *is* repackaged patriarchy.
No access to this article though.
Post a Comment